The
fundamentals of the employer-employee relationship is based on the principals
of fiduciary trusts.
When the basic
fundamental of the relationship is breached by either party, then there is
sufficient excuse or reason for the relationship to end i.e. employment.
Action by an
employee that will be categorized as a misconduct that is also in breach of the
relationship will justify for a summary dismissal from the employment.
Misconducts
such as acts of fraudulent, forgeries and theft will cause the
Company to lose faith and confidence on an employee that warrants for immediate
release of employment, that is DISMISSAL. Such criminal in nature acts are also
categorized as Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) that also prosecutable under the
criminal law.
In the Industrial Court case of SOIL DYNAMICS (M) Sdn. Bhd.
v. YONG FUI KIEW [2005] 2 ILR 817:
"... the relationship between an employer and an
employee is of a fiduciary character and if the employee does an act
which is inconsistent with the fiduciary relationship then it will be an act
of bad faith for which his services can be terminated”.
Also in the case of Court
of Appeal of Telekom Malaysia Kawasan Utara v. Krishnan Kutty Sanguni
Nair & Anor [2002] 3 CLJ 314 (“Telekom case”) clearly stated the
standard of proof required to be met even where criminal related misconducts
are concerned. The Court of Appeal in the Telekom case held as follows:-
“Thus, we can see that the
preponderant view is that the Industrial Court, when hearing a claim of unjust
dismissal, even where the ground is one of dishonest act, including “theft”,
is not required to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the
employee has “committed the offence”, as in a criminal prosecution …”.
Similarly
should the act of Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT) were reported to the
authority, criminal proceeding of the act will take place and the court may
impose a much heavier punishment such as the reported case of the Sessions
Court attached with this email where the court has ordered rotan lashes to a
CBT case of an employee from a MNC as reported by the RakyatPost here.
No comments:
Post a Comment